Cornejo v. Pfeiffer, et al.
Petitioner: Jesse Cornejo
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer and The Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2018cv00572
Filed: March 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 5/9/2019 DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 01/16/19 ADOPTING 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full GRANTING 12 Motion to Strike unexhausted claims one and four; Claims one and four are DISMISSED as unexhausted. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner's habeas petition addressing the remaining, properly exhausted claims (claims two, three, and five) within 60 days. Any reply from Petitioner is due 30 days after service of the answer. (Benson, A.)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/26/2018 RECOMMENDING 12 Motion to Strike Unexhausted Claims one and four be granted; claims one and four be dismissed as unexhausted; Respondent be directed to file a response to Petitioner's habeas petition addressing the properly exhausted claims (claims two, three, and five) within 60 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations; and Petitioner be directed to file a reply, if any, within 30 days after service of the answer. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/22/2018 GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his opposition to 12 Motion to Dismiss. (Henshaw, R)
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/31/2018 GRANTING 10 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent to have up to and including 7/24/2018 to file a responsive pleading. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornejo v. Pfeiffer, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse Cornejo
Represented By: Andres Enrique Salas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Represented By: Ivan Paolo Marrs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?