Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness et al v. City of Sacramento
| Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness, James Lee Clark and "SHOC" Sacramento Homeless Organizing Committee |
| City of Sacramento |
| 2:2018cv00878 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/29/2020 GRANTING Plaintiffs' 40 Motion for Attorney Fees, except with respect to $3,616.26 in fees that the City has identified as clerical in nature. Consequently, fees are AWARDED in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant City of Sacramento in the amount of $318,005.07 and shall be TAXED accordingly. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
36
CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/20. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/19/2018 EXTENDING time to submit discovery plan; The time for the Parties to submit their discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and this Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall be 21 days after issuance by the Court of an order regarding the P.I. Motion. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
