United States of America v. Peery
| United States of America |
| Newman S. Peery |
| 2:2018cv01074 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/12/2020 ADVISING defendant that documents related to his appeal must be filed directly in the Court of Appeals and should not be filed in this court. Documents filed since the closing date will be DISREGARDED and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDERsigned by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 94 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 86 Defendant's motion to dismiss. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
101
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/30/2019 RECOMMENDING that the United States' 88 motion for summary judgment be granted. Defendant Newman S. Peery, Jr. be found indebted to the United States in the a mount of $276,870.94 for unpaid individual federal income tax and penalties for 2009 and 2010, less any additional credits according to proof, plus interest and other statutory additions, as provided by law, from 7/24/2019 until the judgment is fully paid. Defendant Peery's 91 cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. This case be closed. Motions referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
94
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONSsigned by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/10/19 RECOMMENDING that defendant's e 86 Motion to Dismiss be denied Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/29/2019 LIFTING the temporary stay of this case. Not later than 2/13/2019, the parties shall file status reports. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer regarding possible VDRP participation , and if both parties agree, contact the court's VDRP administrator to make the necessary arrangements, within 45 days of this order. The parties are also INFORMED that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a US Magistrate Judge. Consent forms should be returned to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of this order. (cc VDRP Administrator) (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/15/19 ADOPTING 54 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; DENYING 47 Motion to Dismiss. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
54
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/14/18 RECOMMENDING that 47 Motion to Dismiss be Denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/17/2018 DENYING 7 , 27 , 32 Motion for Discovery without prejudice; DENYING 33 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Defendant's motion to dismiss s hall be filed no later than 10/31/2018, and shall be properly noticed for hearing before the undersigned. Defendant is limited to only one motion pending at any time. Such motion must be properly noticed for hearing. The 9/26/2018 hearing on plaintiff's amended motion for discovery, 32 , and amended motion to dismiss, 33 , is hereby VACATED; and Failure to comply with this order may result in improper documents being stricken from the record. (Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Peery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Hauck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Newman S. Peery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
