Coffman Specialties, Inc. v. Martin Brothers Construction
| Coffman Specialties, Inc. |
| Martin Brothers Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland |
| 2:2018cv01113 |
| May 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/13/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/21/18, ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to randomly reassign this case to another district judge. This case is REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez for any further proceedings. Henceforth the new case is 2:18-cv-01113-JAM-EFB. All dates set in this case before the undersigned are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/18 ORDERING this Action shall be STAYED until after the arbitration proceeding is finally completed and either (a) a petition to confirm or vacate the arbitration award is filed with the Court; (b) a Request for Dismissal of this action is filed with the Court; or (c) further Order of the Court; the Court shall retain jurisdiction of the action. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
