Neal v. State of California et al
| Robert W. Neal |
| State of California, Anthony Rendon, Kevin de Leon, Jerry Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, Kevin Hoffman, Ryan Souza, Brantley Choate, Paul Smith, Kathleen Allison, Devin Fong, David Grant and Office of American with Disabilities Act |
| 2:2018cv01259 |
| May 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/6/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 25 , 26 Findings and Recommendations, and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2019 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2019 GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint as detailed in this Order and RECOMMENDING Plaintiff's claims alleging violation of his constitutional rights, raised in 19 Second Amended Complaint, be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/13/2019 VACATING the 2/13/2019 22 findings and recommendations issued 2/13/2019. The Clerk shall re-serve plaintiff with the 1/29/2019 order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/13/2019 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/29/2019 ADOPTING the 15 findings and recommendations to the extent they address plaintiff's motions for class certification and injunctive relief. Plaintiff's 8 motion for class certification is DENIED. Plaintiffs 6 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/27/2018 DISMISSING plaintiff's amended complaint with 30 days to file a second amended complaint, in compliance with this order; failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/29/18 DENYING 7 motion for irregular discovery; DENYING 9 plaintiff's motion to amend; DENYING 13 plaintiff's motion for an order directing def endants to accept service; and DENYING 10 defendants' motion to hold plaintiff's motions in abeyance. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with 30 days to file an amended complaint, in accordance with the order discussed above. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for class certification 8 be denied. Plantiff's motion for injunctive relief 6 be denied. Motions 6 and 8 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
