Kendrid v. Aguilera
Plaintiff: Forrest Kendrid
Defendant: N. Aguilera
Case Number: 2:2018cv01612
Filed: June 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/13/20 DENYING 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve plaintiff with another copy of the 28 discovery and scheduling order filed November 13, 2019. (Plummer, M)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/08/19 LIFTING the STAY of this action. Within 21 days of the filing of this order, defendant shall file a response to the complaint.(Plummer, M)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/10/19 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Forrest Kendrid on 9/26/19 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: KJN and OTCD) (Plummer, M)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/18/2019 REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. Plaintiff shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Henshaw, R)
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/25/18 GRANTING 5 Motion for Reconsideration and, if plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the filing fee will be waived. Within thirty days of service of this order, plaintiff must submit an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new non-prisoner Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Plummer, M)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2018 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, an application to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerks shall send plaintiff a non-prisoner ifp application. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kendrid v. Aguilera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Forrest Kendrid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Aguilera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?