Hay v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Zak Franklin Hay |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2018cv01706 |
| June 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Trinity |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/9/2022 GRANTING in PART 33 Motion for Attorney Fees. The court APPROVES a total fee award to plaintiff's counsel in the amount of $55,664.24. The Commissioner shall pay plaintiff� 39;s counsel the $45,997.12 available in plaintiff's withholding account. The remainder of $9,667.12 is due to plaintiff's counsel under the fee contract with plaintiff, and Plaintiff's counsel shall refund plaintiff the $22,951.26 previously awarded under the EAJA. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/25/2021 GRANTING IN PART 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED $18,801.75 for Attorney fees. And The Commissioner shall determine whether Plaintiff's EAJA Attorney fe es are subject to any offset permitted under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program and, if the fees are not subject to an offset, shall honor Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/22/2020 EXTENDING Time to 10/18/2020, for Plaintiff to file a reply to 28 Opposition to his 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/26/2020 ORDERING that defendant shall file, within 21 days from the date of service of this order, either (1) a stipulation and proposed order resolving plaintiff's fee motion, or (2) an opposition in response to plaintiff's motion. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/27/2020 GRANTING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. DENYING The Commissioner's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order; and The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/19 ORDERING plaintiffs reply to defendants cross motion for summary judgment is now due on December 15, 2019. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/19/2019 GRANTING defendant's 17 Motion for an Extension. Defendant shall file his motion for summary judgment and/or remand on or before 10/25/2019. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/10/19 EXTENDING time for defendant to file Motion for Summary Judgment to 09/10/19. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/11/19 AMENDING Scheduling order 11 . Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed on or before 6/10/19. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed on or before 7/10/2019 and Plaintiff's reply, if any, will be filed on or before 7/31/2019. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/9/19 GRANTING plaintiff until 5/23/19 to file their Motion for Summary Judgment. (Coll, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hay v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zak Franklin Hay | |
| Represented By: | Robert Weems |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
