(PS) Staar v. Amador County Court et al
Monica Staar |
Sheriff's Department, Planning Permits, Amador County Court and Public Works-Road Department |
2:2018cv02078 |
July 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
John A Mendez |
Kendall J Newman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/2018 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed as duplicative. Plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations served on Monica Staar. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Monica Staar. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amador County Court, Planning Permits, Public Works-Road Department, Sheriff's Department by Monica Staar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.