Van Dyke et al v. Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC
| James Van Dyke and Connie Jerome |
| Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC |
| 2:2018cv02531 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Morrison C England |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC on 10/16/2018, Answer due 12/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 Proof of Service)(Powell, Matthew) Modified on 10/29/2018 (Washington, S). |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew W. Powell* *Wilke Fleury Hoffelt Gould & Birney, LLP* *400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor* *Sacramento, California 95814*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Connie Jerome, James Van Dyke (Powell, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC by James Van Dyke, Connie Jerome. Attorney Powell, Matthew W. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7875828) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Powell, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
