Buntun v. 1st Class Staffing, LLC
| Raynisha Buntun |
| 1st Class Staffing, LLC |
| 2:2018cv02955 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C England |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Raynisha Buntun. (Tatavos-Gharajeh, Shunt) |
| Filing 5 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by 1st Class Staffing, LLC. (McKelvey, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Raynisha Buntun. (Tatavos-Gharajeh, Shunt) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by 1st Class Staffing, LLC re #2 Civil New Case Documents for MCE. (McKelvey, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UOE-2018-0012531 by 1st Class Staffing, LLC. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7963461) (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Proof of Service)(McKelvey, Brandon) on 11/14/2018 (Benson, A.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
