(PC)Moore v. Ali et al
| Eugene Edward Moore |
| California Correctional Health Care Services, L Cooley, Kashif Ali, J Domey and Jennifer Villa |
| 2:2019cv00332 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (text only): This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: (ECF No. 5) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal served on Eugene Edward Moore. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Eugene Edward Moore. (York, M) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *2/25/19*; Consent or Decline due by 4/1/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Eugene Edward Moore. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Eugene Edward Moore. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Kashif Ali, California Correctional Health Care Services, L Cooley, J Domey, Jennifer Villa by Eugene Edward Moore.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
