(HC) Morris v. Baughman
| Condalee Morris |
| David Baughman |
| 2:2019cv00661 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28:2254 |
| None |
RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Condalee Morris. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order and ifp application served on Condalee Morris. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/23/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to send petitioner a new ifp application. Petitioner has 30 days to submit the required application or pay the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
| Filing 8 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Condalee Morris, CDC V-96203 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider, 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Condalee Morris. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-0661-TLN-EFB (HC). (Huang, H) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Condalee Morris. (Huang, H) Modified on 4/23/2019 (Plummer, M). |
| Filing 4 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Condalee Morris. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for ORDER to Show Cause by Condalee Morris. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to STAY pending exhaustion of Claim 4 by Condalee Morris. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against David Baughman by Condalee Morris. (MAINTAINED ON PAPER) (Huang, H) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/22/2019) (Huang, H). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Morris v. Baughman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David Baughman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Condalee Morris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
