Tolefree v. Swift Transportation Co. Inc. et al
| Ronniesa Tolefree |
| Swift Transportation Co. Inc., Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. and Swift Transportation Co. Inc. Doing business as Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00693 |
| April 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE of #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Civil New Case Documents for KJM, #2 Civil Cover Sheet by All Defendants. (McCalla, Jacqueline) Modified on 4/26/2019 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/29/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Swift Transportation Co. Inc. (McCalla, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2018-00240428 by Defendants. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8225863) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel Monti, #2 Declaration of Jacqueline V. McCalla)(McCalla, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
