(PS)(UD)MG Waterfield Square Apartments LP v. Leonard
| MG Waterfield Square Apartments LP |
| Lovina Leonard and Lovina Leonard-PREFILING ORDER |
| 2:2019cv00716 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Morrison C England |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/29/19 REMANDING the action to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; DENYING Defendant's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) as moot; The Clerk is ordered not to open another case removing the following unlawful detainer action: No. STK-CV-LUDR-2019-801. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Lovina Leonard and San Joaquin County Superior Court #STK-CV-LUDR-2019-801. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Lovina Leonard. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of San Joaquin, Case number STKCVLUDR2018-13089 filed by Lovina Leonard. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Interested entities or parties, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
