(HC) Knapp v. Diaz
Petitioner: Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Respondent: Ralph Diaz
Case Number: 2:2019cv02066
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gregory G Hollows
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Eric Charles Rodney Knapp. (York, M)
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Ralph Diaz by Eric Charles Rodney Knapp. (Attachments: #1 Petition- Contd Part 1, #2 Contd Part 2, #3 Contd Part 3, #4 Contd Part 4, #5 Contd Part 5, #6 Contd Part 6, #7 Contd Part 7, #8 Contd Part 8, #9 Contd Part 9 & Final) (York, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Knapp v. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ralph Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?