(PC) Montgomery v. Cox et al
Dwayne S. Montgomery and Dwayne Steven Montgomery |
T. Cox, R. Colby and S. Benavidez |
2:2019cv02081 |
October 17, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Kendall J Newman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to R. Colby on 11/21/2019, Answer due 1/21/2020. Attorney Whisnand, Andrew James added as counsel of record. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Whisnand, Andrew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendants: T. Cox and R. Colby. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Becknal, R) |
![]() |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #14 Order served on Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Yin, K) |
Filing 13 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 12 [DISMISSED PURSUANT TO #14 ORDER] FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 11/8/2019 (Yin, K). |
Filing 11 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP application #2 served on Director of CDC. (Plummer, M) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *R. Colby, T. Cox* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Dwayne Steven Montgomery K-14298* *Mule Creek State Prison* *PO Box 409020* *Ione - California -95640-9020*. (Plummer, M) |
![]() |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to the order and findings and recommendations, this case has been assigned to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-2081 MCE KJN (PC). (Plummer, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate, Findings and Recommendations (Motion), Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Plummer, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, served on Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Dwayne Steven Montgomery (Tupolo, A) |
CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Dwayne S. Montgomery, CDCR# K-14298 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/17/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 11/21/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Dwayne S. Montgomery. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against S. Benavidez, R. Colby, T. Cox by Dwayne S. Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A) |
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Dwayne S. Montgomery. (Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.