Carranza v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
| Maricela Carranza |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation Doing business as Amtrak |
| 2:2019cv02119 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Morrison C England |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Attorney Offill-Klein, Alexei N. added.(Offill-Klein, Alexei) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: National Railroad Passenger Corporation served on 10/25/2019, answer due 11/15/2019. (Kershaw, William) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *National Railroad Passenger Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William A. Kershaw* *Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC* *401 Watt Avenue* *Sacramento, CA 95864*. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Maricela Carranza. Attorney Kershaw, William A. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8523831) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kershaw, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
