(PC) Taylor v. Amador County Public Defenders Office et al
| Brandon Taylor and Brandon La'Shaun Taylor |
| Amador County Conflict Defenders Office and Amador County Public Defenders Office |
| 2:2019cv02242 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/2/2020 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. This case is assigned to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for all further proceedings. New Case Number is 2:19-cv-2242 KJM DMC (PC). (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Reassigning Case served on Brandon La'Shaun Taylor. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/22/2019 GRANTING #2 and #7 Motions to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Brandon La'Shaun Taylor. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Brandon La'Shaun Taylor. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for ORDER allowing Phone Privileges by Brandon La'Shaun Taylor. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Brandon La'Shaun Taylor (Tupolo, A) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Brandon Taylor, CDCR# BH-7136 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *11/7/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 12/12/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Brandon Taylor. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Amador County Conflict Defenders Office, Amador County Public Defenders Office by Brandon Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Brandon Taylor. (Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
