Williams v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
Carlos Williams |
Rancho Cordova Police Department and Sacramento County Sheriff's Department |
2:2019cv02345 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Rancho Cordova Police Department.(Whitefleet, John) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE re #2 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Rancho Cordova Police Department. (Whitefleet, John) Modified on 12/5/2019 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Sacramento County Sheriff's Department. Attorney Cahill, Nicole Marie added.(Cahill, Nicole) |
Filing 4 JOINDER in Removal of Action by Sacramento County Sheriff's Department re #1 Notice of Removal. Attorney Longyear, Dayton Van Vranken added. (Longyear, Dayton) Modified on 12/3/2019 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court by Rancho Cordova Police Department. (Whitefleet, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2019-00266490 by Rancho Cordova Police Department. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8579434) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whitefleet, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.