(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF et al
| Randy Ausborn |
| Laura Eldridge, CHCF, Anise Adams and Chanden Dha |
| 2:2020cv00593 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Randy Ausborn signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/23/2020. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with this order. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/23/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 application to proceed ifp and DENYING as moot plaintiff's #6 plaintiff's second application to proceed ifp. Plaintiff's #5 first amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. Failure to file an amended complaint that complies with this order may result in the dismissal of this action for the reasons stated herein. (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Dismissing Case with Leave to Amend, #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Randy Ausborn. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Randy Ausborn. (Coll, A) Modified on 3/30/2020 (Plummer, M). |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Randy Ausborn. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Randy Ausborn (Tupolo, A) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Randy Ausborn, CDCR# BG-2193 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *3/18/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 4/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (York, M) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Randy Ausborn. (York, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Randy Ausborn. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Randy Ausborn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (York, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
