(HC) Dixon v. Lozano
| Daniel Steve Dixon |
| Jared R. Lozano |
| 2:2020cv00604 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gregory G Hollows |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #6 by Petitioner Daniel Steve Dixon. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/1/2020 GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file objections on or before 5/20/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Daniel Steve Dixon. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for 16-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file objections to findings and recommendations by Daniel Steve Dixon. (Reader, L) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/14/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge; and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed as a second or successive habeas corpus application without prejudice to its refiling with a copy of an order from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing Petitioner to file a successive petition. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-0604 KJM GGH (HC). (Henshaw, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Daniel Steve Dixon. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/23/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Daniel Steve Dixon. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Daniel Steve Dixon. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Jared R. Lozano by Daniel Steve Dixon.(Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Dixon v. Lozano | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jared R. Lozano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Steve Dixon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
