(PC) Glass v. CDCR et al
Donald Glass |
J. Beals, S. Thomas, J. Rodriguez, J. Temple, C. Lacy, F. Velasco, CSP Sacramento, CDCR, J. Musgrave and M. Danial |
2:2020cv01123 |
June 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE of Supplement Prisoner Trust Account Statement by Donald Glass. (Huang, H) |
Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Donald Glass. (Coll, A) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/5/2020 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerk shall send plaintiff an ifp application. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and ifp application served on Donald Glass. (Yin, K) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Flores, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Donald Glass. (Flores, E) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against J. Beals, CDCR, CSP Sacramento, M. Danial, C. Lacy, J. Musgrave, J. Rodriguez, J. Temple, S. Thomas, F. Velasco by Donald Glass. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.