Z.R. v. United States of America et al
| Z.R. |
| Carrie Basaca, United States of America and United States Air Force |
| 2:2020cv01181 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Carrie Basaca served on 7/16/2020, answer due 8/6/2020. (Burris, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Kenneth Chike Odiwe on behalf of Z.R. Attorney Odiwe, Kenneth Chike added. (Odiwe, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Carrie Basaca, United States Air Force, United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *John L. Burris* *Law Offices of John L. Burris* *7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120* *Oakland, CA 94621*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Z.R.. Attorney Burris, John L. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8938667) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burris, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
