(PC) Demisi v. Phan et al
| Mohammad Khalid Demisi |
| Ernaga, Kashif Ali, Myra Ladista, Stephanie Phan, C Carr, Rivera, Mason, Jacob Goldman, Dawn Wagner, Eastman and Dike |
| 2:2020cv01692 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Refused, Paroled/Discharged: #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment sent to Mohammad Khalid Demisi. Notice of Change of Address due by 12/21/2020. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Mohammad Khalid Demisi signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/30/2020. Plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with this order. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Mohammad Khalid Demisi. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Mohammad Khalid Demisi. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Mohammad Khalid Demisi, CDCR# BJ-6346 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/28/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Mohammad Khalid Demisi. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Mohammad Khalid Demisi. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Mohammad Khalid Demisi. (MAINTAINED ON PAPER) (Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
