(PC) Blackwell v. Covello et al
| Rodney Karl Blackwell |
| Patrick Covello and CDCR, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations |
| 2:2020cv01755 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rodney Karl Blackwell. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 9/9/2020 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/31/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 10/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rodney Karl Blackwell. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Rodney Karl Blackwell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tupolo, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
