Kabasele v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dorcas-Cothy Kabasele
Defendant: Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021at00854
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. by Dorcas-Cothy Kabasele. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9812774) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scardigli, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kabasele v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorcas-Cothy Kabasele
Represented By: Nicholas John Scardigli
Represented By: Robert Joshua Wasserman
Represented By: William J. Gorham, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?