(PC) Foster v. Newsom
Martin Lee Foster |
Gavin Newsom |
2:2021cv00316 |
February 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/16/2021 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a complete application to proceed ifp, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp form. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #15 Order and ifp application served on Martin Lee Foster. (Yin, K) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of evidence by Martin Lee Foster (Reader, L) |
Filing 13 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Martin Lee Foster. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 4/13/2021 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 12 EVIDENCE SUMMARY by Martin Lee Foster re #3 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 11 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Martin Lee Foster. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 4/7/2021 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Martin Lee Foster re welfare check. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION re: cases by Martin Lee Foster. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/23/2021 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a complete ifp application, with required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk shall send plaintiff an ifp form. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order and ifp form served on Martin Lee Foster. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Martin Lee Foster. (Coll, A) |
Filing 6 REQUEST to FORWARD by Martin Lee Foster. (Coll, A) |
Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Martin Lee Foster. (Coll, A) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 3 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Gavin Newsom by Martin Lee Foster. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Zignago, K.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Martin Lee Foster. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Gavin Newsom by Martin Lee Foster. (Zignago, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PC) Foster v. Newsom | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Gavin Newsom | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Martin Lee Foster | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.