GEICO Indemnity Co. v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
| GEICO Indemnity Company |
| Anne Elizabeth Gaskins and United States Marshals Service |
| 2:2021cv00590 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff GEICO Indemnity Company. (Aul, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Aul, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Anne Elizabeth Gaskins, United States Marshals Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Katherine R. Aul* *Law Office of Darlene Rohr* *14111 Danielson St., Suite 100* *Poway, CA 92064*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by GEICO Indemnity Company (Aul, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by GEICO Indemnity Company. Attorney Aul, Katherine R. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9511548) (Aul, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
