(HC)Juarez v. Thompson
Petitioner: Jose Elias Juarez
Respondent: Paul Thompson
Case Number: 2:2021cv00945
Filed: May 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to File Response to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Paul Thompson. Attorney Rodriguez, Michelle added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rodriguez, Michelle) Modified on 7/28/2021 (Yin, K).
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:21-CV-00945-TLN-KJN. (Rodriguez, E)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Jose Elias Juarez. (Rodriguez, E)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition served on the U.S. Attorney's Office pursuant to #3 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition. (Yin, K)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/27/2021 DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the petition within 60 days. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition on the US Attorney.(Yin, K)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Jose Elias Juarez. (Yin, K)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE200114366 $5.00 HC Filing Fee fbo Jose Juarez by Elias C. Juarez on 5/26/2021. (Reader, L)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 6/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Reader, L)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Paul Thompson by Jose Elias Juarez.(Reader, L)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jose Elias Juarez. (Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC)Juarez v. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Thompson
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit
Represented By: Michelle Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Elias Juarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?