(PC) Gosztyla v. Ly et al
| Richard Joseph Gosztyla |
| B. Ly, D. Berry and B. Archibald |
| 2:2021cv01717 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 LETTER from Richard Joseph Gosztyla re #8 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE(text only) Parties are notified that this docket entry was inadvertently entered in the wrong case and the same shall be DISREGARDED #10 . (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 10 [DISREGARDED] MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 10/25/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against B. Archibald, D. Berry, B. Ly by Richard Joseph Gosztyla.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Trust Account of Richard Joseph Gosztyla signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/29/2021. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/29/2021 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed ifp and DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend, #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Huang, H) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Richard Joseph Gosztyla, CDCR# BJ-2002 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *9/21/2021*; Consent or Decline due by 10/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Richard Joseph Gosztyla. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
