(PS) Gastelum v. Arden Fair Associates
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Defendant: Arden Fair Associates Doing business as Forever 21 Sacramento
Case Number: 2:2021cv01722
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: John A Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/2021 ORDERING that this action is STAYED pending further order of the court. The parties are DIRECTED to promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement of this action. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a settlement within 45 days, the parties shall initiate participation in the court's VDRP Program. The parties shall jointly file their VDRP Report no later than 14 days after completion of the VDRP session. (Rodriguez, E)
October 27, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order served on Fernando Gastelum. (Rodriguez, E)
October 25, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint by Arden Fair Associates. Attorney Okelberry, Nathan V. added. (Okelberry, Nathan) Modified on 10/26/2021 (Coll, A).
October 18, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Arden Fair Associates served on 10/4/2021. (Kaminski, H)
September 22, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O) Modif
September 22, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Arden Fair Associates* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Fernando Gastelum* *209 W. 9th Street* *Casa Grande, AZ 85122*. (Rivera, O)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/21/2021. CASE TRANSFERRRED to SACRAMENTO Division. Old Case Number 1:21-cv-01399-NONE-BAM. New Case Number 2:21-cv-01722-JAM-AC. (Rivera, O)
September 22, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Order, #3 Summons, #4 Civil New Case Documents for JAM served on Fernando Gastelum. (Rivera, O)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arden Fair Associates by Fernando Gastelum. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Lundstrom, T)
September 20, 2021 RECEIPT number #CAE100049160 $402.00 fbo Fernando G Gastelum by Fernando G Gastelum on 9/20/2021. (Lundstrom, T)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PS) Gastelum v. Arden Fair Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arden Fair Associates Doing business as Forever 21 Sacramento
Represented By: Nathan V. Okelberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?