Ahart, et al., v. USA, et al.,
| Ernest W. Ahart, Jr., Ahart Livestock, Inc. and Unigard Insurance Company |
| United States of America and Pride Industries |
| 2:2021cv01832 |
| October 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Torts to Land |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/10/2022 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pride Industries* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jay D. Harker* *Clausen Miller P.C.* *27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 200* *Mission Viejo, CA 92691*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jay D. Harker* *Clausen Miller P.C.* *27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 200* *Mission Viejo, CA 92691*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by All Plaintiffs. Attorney Harker, Jay D. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9851984) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harker, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
