United States of America v. Ataya et al
| United States of America |
| Inaam Ataya and Hani Ataya |
| 2:2021mc00290 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Morrison C England |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/31/2022: The court has received the parties' joint notice of settlement as to all claims. (ECF No. #8 .) Accordingly, the show cause hearing set for 2/1/2022 (ECF Nos. 3, 4), along with all other dates previously set in this matter, are VACATED. Petitioner shall file settlement/dismissal documents, in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160, no later than 2/22/2022. (Text Only Entry) (Waldrop, A) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT by United States of America. Dispositional Docs due by 2/22/2022. (Tennyson, Steven) |
| Filing 7 REPLY by United States of America re #6 Answer to Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - Tolling Agreement)(Tennyson, Steven) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER by Hani Ataya, Inaam Ataya. Attorney Luoma, Richard Todd added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Luoma, Richard) Modified on 1/21/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re 4 Minute Order by United States of America. (Tennyson, Steven) Modified on 1/21/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2022: Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, the show cause hearing set for Tuesday, 2/1/2022 at 9:00 AM (see ECF No. 3) will now take place remotely via Zoom, instead of in person. Parties proceeding Pro Se (without counsel) will receive the Zoom appearance instructions by mail, with phone instructions included as well. The parties may contact Courtroom Deputy Alexandra Shaddox-Waldrop at (916) 930-4187 should they have any questions regarding the Zoom appearance. Counsel will receive an email containing the necessary appearance information.Before the hearing, the government SHALL file proof of service confirming that respondents were timely served with the documents described in the Show Cause Order (ECF No. 3 paragraph 2). As stated in the Show Cause Order, respondents' written defense or opposition to the enforcement petition SHALL be filed no later than Monday, 1/24/2022. (Text Only Entry) (Waldrop, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order with Zoom Instructions served on Hani Ataya, Inaam Ataya. (Waldrop, A) Modified on 1/19/2022 (Donati, J). |
Filing 3
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/2021 DIRECTING Respondents Hani Ataya and Inaam Ataya to appear and Show Cause on 2/1/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.(Donati, J)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order to Show Cause served on Hani Ataya, Inaam Ataya. (Donati, J) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED ORDER re to Show Cause re Tax Summons Enforcement re #1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities)(Tennyson, Steven) |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Petition to enforce IRS summons. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to ENFORCE IRS SUMMONS by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Brian Frizzi, #3 Exhibit A)(Tennyson, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
