(HC)Harris v. Clark
Petitioner: Devante B. Harris
Respondent: Ken Clark
Case Number: 2:2022cv00066
Filed: January 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/25/22 DENYING #5 Motion for Extension of time to pay the filing fee. (Plummer, M)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion for Extension served on Devante B. Harris. (Plummer, M)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Reader, L)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST for extension of time to pay filing fee by Devante B. Harris (Reader, L) Modified on 2/24/2022 (Plummer, M).
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/15/2022 DISMISSING petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus with leave to file an amended petition within 30 days. The Clerk shall send petitioner a habeas corpus application form. (Yin, K)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and 2254 form served on Devante B. Harris. (Yin, K)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE200119289 $5.00 fbo Devante B. Harris by Francianna Patterson on 2/10/2022. (Benson, A.)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/18/2022 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Henshaw, R)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Devante B. Harris. (Henshaw, R)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Reader, L)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Devante B. Harris. (Reader, L)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Ken Clark by Devante B. Harris.(Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC)Harris v. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Devante B. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ken Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?