USA v. Approx. $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2022cv00077 |
January 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Kendall J Newman |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SERVICE BY PUBLICATION filed by United States of America. Last publication date 02/17/22. (Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by United States of America re #6 Order, #2 Civil New Case Documents for MCE, #4 Order, #5 Writ Issued, #3 Amended Complaint. (Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: by United States of America re #1 Complaint, #2 Civil New Case Documents for MCE, #4 Order, #5 Writ Issued, #3 Amended Complaint. (Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Arrest of defendant currency and Warrant for Arrest by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/14/2022 ORDERING Rule G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions provides that the U.S. shall cause public notice of the action to be given in a newspaper of general circulation or on the official internet government forfeiture site. A statement that answers to the Complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the FRCP must be filed and served within 21 days after the filing of the claims and, in the absence thereof, default may be entered and condemnation ordered.(Reader, L) |
Filing 5 WARRANT FOR ARREST OF ARTICLES IN REM. (Huang, H) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/13/2022 ORDERING that the Clerk for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, shall issue a Warrant for Arrest of Articles In Rem for the defendant currency. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Huang, H) |
Filing 3 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency by United States of America.(Khasigian, Kevin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture in Rem against Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency by United States of America. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Order for Publication)(Khasigian, Kevin). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Approx. $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian, GOVT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.