Puckett v. County of Sacramento et al
| Jeremy Phillip Puckett |
| County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office, Sacramento County District Attorney's Office, Marjorie Durenberger, Marci Minter, Lori Gregersen, Willard Bayles, Robert Bell, Kay Maulsby and Donald Henrikson |
| 2:2022cv00350 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Lori Gregersen served on 3/9/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) Modified on 3/23/2022 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/18/2022: Upon request of the parties, ECF No. #13 , and with the approval of the court, the deadline for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. #1 , is EXTENDED to 5/16/2022. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #1 by Willard Bayles, Robert Bell, County of Sacramento, Marjorie Durenberger, Lori Gregersen, Kay Maulsby, Marci Minter, Sacramento County District Attorney's Office, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office. Attorney Whitefleet, John Robert added. (Whitefleet, John) Modified on 3/21/2022 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Robert Bell served on 3/12/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Marci Minter served on 2/28/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Willard Bayles served on 2/27/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Marjorie Durenberger served on 2/26/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kay Maulsby served on 2/26/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Donald Henrikson served on 2/26/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Sacramento County District Attorney's Office served on 2/25/2022, answer due 3/18/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Sacramento County Sheriff's Office served on 2/25/2022, answer due 3/18/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: County of Sacramento served on 2/25/2022, answer due 3/18/2022. (Frahn, Harrison) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2022 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Willard Bayles, Robert Bell, County of Sacramento, Marjorie Durenberger, Lori Gregersen, Donald Henrikson, Kay Maulsby, Marci Minter, Sacramento County District Attorney's Office, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Harrison J. Frahn, IV* *Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP* *2475 Hanover Street* *Palo Alto, CA 94304*. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jeremy Phillip Puckett. Attorney Frahn, Harrison J. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10088641) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Frahn, Harrison). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
