McLeod et al v. City of Redding et al
| Veronica McLeod, Amado Hernandez and Ysidra Regaldo |
| City of Redding and Garrett Maxwell |
| 2:2022cv00585 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| William B Shubb |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Garrett Maxwell served on 5/13/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: City of Redding served on 5/13/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 8/1/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Redding, Garrett Maxwell* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Dale K. Galipo* *Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo* *21800 Burbank Blvd. Suite 310* *Woodland Hills, CA 91367*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Veronica McLeod, Ysidra Regaldo, Amado Hernandez. Attorney Galipo, Dale K. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10156175) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Galipo, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
