(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Eric E. Martinez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2022cv00697 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In accordance with the Social Security Scheduling Order in effect for cases filed on or after June 15, 2021, Defendant Commissioner of Social Security hereby acknowledges electronic service of the complaint through the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel's designated email address on 6/1/2022. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Social Security Admin- SS E-Service, ) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Brixie, Peter) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 7/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) [ Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *90* days. Attorney *Peter Brixie* *Law Office of Peter Brixie* *410 12th Street, Suite 1* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 04/25/2022 GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons, new case documents and complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Eric E Martinez. (Brixie, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Eric E Martinez (Brixie, Peter) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Eric E Martinez.(Brixie, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric E. Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Peter Brixie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Admin- SS E-Service |
| Represented By: | US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
