(PS) Wooten v. The State of California et al
| Robert Wooten |
| The State of California and Gavin Newsom |
| 2:2022cv00850 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/6/2022 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Referred to Judge Troy L Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Findings and Recommendations served on Robert Wooten. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/03/2022 GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP. No later than 06/20/2022, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Robert Wooten. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert Wooten. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Robert Wooten. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (Emergency Relief Request) against All Defendants by Robert Wooten.(Kastilahn, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
