(SS) Kiser v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Carrie Juannell Kiser |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2023cv00091 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Franco Becia for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service terminated (Bella, Christopher) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 4/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Reader, L) [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *90* days. Attorney *Stuart T. Barasch* *Olinsky Law Group* *P.O. Box 961719* *El Paso, Texas 79996*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Reader, L) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/23/2023 GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment for social security cases. Service on defendant shall proceed under the court's e-service program. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Carrie Juannell Kiser. (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Carrie Juannell Kiser (Barasch, Stuart) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Carrie Juannell Kiser. Attorney Barasch, Stuart added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barasch, Stuart) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Kiser v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carrie Juannell Kiser | |
| Represented By: | Stuart Barasch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Admin- SS E-Service |
| Represented By: | US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service |
| Represented By: | Franco Becia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
