(HC) Gazaway v. State of CA
Jerald D Gazaway and Jerald D. Gazaway |
State of California |
2:2023cv00699 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jerald D. Gazaway. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 4 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jerald D. Gazaway. (Vij, M) |
Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jerald D. Gazaway. (Vij, M) |
RECEIPT number 200000535 for $5.00 for Jerald D. Gazaway from State of California. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Huang, H) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jerald D Gazaway. (Huang, H) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against State of California by Jerald D Gazaway. (Attachments: #1 Letter re: Filing Fee)(Donati, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.