(HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court
Case Number: 2:2024cv01003
Filed: January 24, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/11/2025 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in Full, DENYING 4 Motion for Release, DISMISSING this case without prejudice for failure to exhaust, and DECLINING to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AMW)
January 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/23/2025 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to this action, and RECOMMENDING that 4 Motion for Release be denied, that the peti tion be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan assigned for all further proceedings. Referred to Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:24-cv-1003-TLN-EFB P. (Deputy Clerk HAH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?