(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
| Ronald Eugene James |
| Sacramento County Superior Court |
| 2:2024cv01511 |
| May 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/3/2024 GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed IFP, ORDERING the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case, and RECOMMENDING that #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney assigned for all further proceedings. Referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:24-cv-1511-TLN-CKD (HC). (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and Findings and Recommendations, served on Ronald Eugene James. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Writ of Certiorari re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, REQUEST FOR COPIES by Ronald Eugene James. (Murphy, J) [Response Sent: The Clerk's Office will provide copies of documents at $0.50 per page. #1 Petition is 85 pages.] Modified on 6/18/2024 (Huang, H).
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ronald Eugene James. (Murphy, J)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kyono, V)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/3/2024 DIRECTING Plaintiff to file a Motion for IFP or pay the $5 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this order.(Kyono, V)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP Form served on Ronald Eugene James. (Kyono, V)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 7/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kyono, V)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Ronald Eugene James. (Kyono, V)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sacramento County Superior Court by Ronald Eugene James.(Kyono, V)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ronald Eugene James | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sacramento County Superior Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
