(HC) Vasquez v. Unknown
Petitioner: Jorge Alejandro Vasquez
Respondent: unknown
Case Number: 2:2024cv02818
Filed: October 15, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Troy L Nunley
Referring Judge: Sean C Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Petitioner Jorge Alejandro Vasquez. (Becknal, R.)
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Copy of petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #5 Order And Findings and Recommendations. (Yin, K)
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 11/22/2024 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition on the AG. IT IS RECOMMENDED petitioner's #1 application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order And Findings and Recommendations served on Jorge Alejandro Vasquez. (Yin, K)
October 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lopez, K)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 11/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number 200009579 for $5.00 for Jorge Alejandro Vasquez from State of California. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 16, 2024 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jorge Alejandro Vasquez. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against unknown by Jorge Alejandro Vasquez. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Vasquez v. Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jorge Alejandro Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?