Chavez et al v. County of Santa Clara
Plaintiff: Brian Chavez and Brandon Bracamonte
Defendant: County of Santa Clara
Case Number: 1:2015cv05277
Filed: November 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Eureka Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 145 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman denying 144 Motion. Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record. (rmilc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2024).
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 123 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman denying 121 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The court finds that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals. (rmilc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2021)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER by Judge Robert M. Illman denying 116 Motion for Civil Contempt; denying 117 Motion to Intervene. (rmilc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2021)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 114 SUA SPONTE Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases 1:15-cv-05277 RMI and 5:20-cv-07208 NC. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/26/2020. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 107 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 79 Motion for Attorney Fees. (rmilc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2019)
January 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER Denying Request for Reassignment. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 1/23/2018. (rmilc1s, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018)
October 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Approving Class Notice. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/6/2016. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)
September 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting 28 Motion to Certify Class.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavez et al v. County of Santa Clara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Chavez
Represented By: Kelly Jean Knapp
Represented By: Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria
Represented By: Donald H. Specter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Bracamonte
Represented By: Kelly Jean Knapp
Represented By: Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria
Represented By: Donald H. Specter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Santa Clara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?