Ward v. Wright et al
Jesse Ward |
Stephen Wright and Lake County |
1:2015cv05627 |
December 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Lake |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 127 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 1/11/2019. (rmilc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2019) |
Filing 115 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 114 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 113 Clerk's Notice, to Continue Further Case Management Conference filed by Stephen Wright. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 10/15/2018. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2018) |
Filing 103 PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 6/29/2018. (rmilc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2018) |
Filing 53 Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Dismiss. Case Management Statement due by 3/7/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2017 02:00 PM.(njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2017) |
Filing 42 Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting 37 Motion to Dismiss.(njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2016) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Motion to Continue; denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.