Maravill Jr. v. Rosas Brothers Construction et al
| Antonio Maravilla, Jr. |
| Rosas Brothers Construction, Victor Manuel Rosas, Jose Humberto Rosas and Jose Luis Rosas |
| 3:2016cv06117 |
| October 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
STATEMENT OF DECISION. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 14, 2019. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2019)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Discovery Cut Off based on illness of counsel filed by Antonio Maravilla, Jr. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 19, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2018)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER granting leave to file late answer filed by Rosas Brothers Construction. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2017)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue CMC filed by Antonio Maravilla, Jr. Case Management Statement due by 4/3/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/12/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 28, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
