Curtis Sneede, et al v. Kenneth Kizer, et al
| Kenneth Kizer, Health and Human Services, Department of, Jesse R. Huff and CA Dept of Finance |
| Louis W. Sullivan |
| Kenneth Kizer |
| 3:1989cv01932 |
| June 5, 1989 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Thelton E. Henderson |
| Welfare |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
319
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Modify January 5, 1990 Injunction. Motions terminated: 309 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/26/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2013)
|
|
Filing
316
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Time to Address 309 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Responses due by 9/23/2013. Replies due by 10/7/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/28/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
312
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Time to Address Defendant Sebelius's Motion for Relief from Judgment. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 309 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Responses due by 8/30/2013. Replies due by 9/12/2013. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/31/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
