Satchell et al v. Fedex Express
| Derrick Satchell, Kalini Boykin, Valerie Brown, Rick Gonzales, Cynthia Guerrero, Ken Stevenson, Daniel Sherman, Kevin Smith, Rachel Hutchins, Sophia Shainza Hanif and Tyrone Merritt |
| Fedex Express |
| Angela Alioto & Angela Alioto PLC and Waukeen Q. McCoy |
| AAPLC |
| Swanson Edward and Edward Swanson |
| 3:2003cv02659 |
| January 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Susan Illston |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
936
ORDER RE: MR. McCOY'S REQUEST FOR STAY OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES PENDING RESOLUTION OF RELATED NINTH CIRCUIT APPEAL (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
906
ORDER DENYING MR. McCOY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 891 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
899
ORDER re: payment from Monitoring Fund re 898 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
890
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES REGARDING MOTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 870 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2008) Modified on 12/30/2008 (ys, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
874
ORDER granting elarment for Mccoy to File Opposition re 873 . Signed by Judge Illston on 10/10/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
