Conwell v. Woodford et al

Case Number: 3:2005cv02930
Filed: July 19, 2005
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2009 42 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Demetrius Conwell against Jeanne Woodford, Thomas L. Carey. On remand from and at the direction of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby conditionally GRANTED, and respondents are directed to release petitioner from custody, unless, within ninety days of the filing of this order, the State of California grants petitioner a new trial. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2009)
March 13, 2009 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Respondents are directed to release petitioner from custody, unless, within ninety days of the filing of this order, the State of California grants petitioner a new trial.Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 13, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conwell v. Woodford et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?